Toward Integration of Trauma, Resilience, and Equity Theory and Practice: A Narrative Review and Call for Consilience.

Investigating the roots of health and illness has inspired unprecedented growth in research on trauma and adversity across academic and scientific disciplines. Can this science achieve its potential? How? Much of this research remains siloed and fragmented, limiting integrative approaches to translating science into a unified paradigm. From age-old traditions to the health, social, and basic sciences, this established and rapidly growing body of work has overwhelmingly found that experiences, both positive and negative, profoundly influence life course health. Such convergence across disciplines highlights the complex, intersectional nature and impact of experiences and reveals consilience: agreement of findings across diverse fields. This narrative review explored 400 sources to curate a representative sample of 98 tracing the evolution of trauma theory and practice from the 19th century to the present. It emphasizes research from 1970 to 2022, with a specific focus on adverse childhood experiences, everyday discrimination, sexual and gender minority stress, acculturative stress, and positive childhood experiences. This research reveals how experiences are a cause, catalyst, and key ingredient of health or of illness, disability, and disparities. The review also proposes steps toward a unified paradigm and showcases innovative integrated models and applications. These examples provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding and lead to more effective solutions. Recognition of consilience can connect multidimensional insights on trauma, resilience, and equity to spark further cross-sector innovations toward health, prevention, and justice. Realizing the promise of consilience will require a new era of radical intentionality, ongoing dialogue, and interdisciplinary collaboration to achieve necessary system transformation.

Is Academic Medicine Prepared to Teach About the Intersection of Childhood Experiences and Health? An Exploratory Survey of Faculty.

INTRODUCTION: Childhood experiences affect health across the lifespan. Evidence-based strategies targeting early-life stress are emerging. Nevertheless, faculty physicians' preparation to incorporate this science into practice has not been well studied. This study explores medical faculty knowledge and beliefs, timing and route of knowledge acquisition, perceived relevance and application of study topics, and characteristics associated with concept mastery. METHODS: The authors developed and administered an exploratory survey to faculty from six departments at two medical schools. The team analyzed responses using quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: Eighty-one (8.8%) eligible faculty completed the survey. Of respondents, 53 (65.4%) achieved high knowledge, 34 (42.0%) high beliefs, and 42 (59.1%) high concept exposure question scores, but only 6 (7.4%) through a formal route. Although 78 (96.8%) respondents indicated that survey concepts are relevant, only 18 (22.2%) reported fully incorporating them in their work, and 48 (59.2%) identified the need for additional coaching. Respondents reporting full incorporation were significantly more likely to attain high concept exposure scores (17 respondents, 94.4%, versus 25 respondents, 39.7%, P < .001). Quantitative and qualitative analysis highlighted limited respondent awareness of trauma prevalence among health care workers, lack of familiarity with interventions, and time and resource challenges addressing childhood adversity. DISCUSSION: Although survey respondents had some familiarity with study concepts and perceived their relevance, most are not fully applying them. Results suggest that exposure to study concepts is associated with full incorporation. Therefore, intentional faculty development is essential to prepare faculty to include this science in practice.

Roadmap for Trauma-Informed Medical Education: Introducing an Essential Competency Set.

Research has established that trauma is nearly universal and a root cause of numerous health and social problems, including 6 of the 10 leading causes of death, with devastating consequences across the life course. Scientific evidence now recognizes the complex injurious nature of structural and historical trauma (i.e., racism, discrimination, sexism, poverty, and community violence). Meanwhile, many physicians and trainees grapple with their own trauma histories and face direct and secondary traumatization on the job. These findings substantiate the profound impact of trauma on the brain and body and why trauma training is critical to the education and practice of physicians. However, a critical lag remains in translating essential research insights into clinical teaching and care. Recognizing this gap, the National Collaborative on Trauma-Informed Health Care Education and Research (TIHCER) formed a task force charged with developing and validating a summary of core trauma-related knowledge and skills for physicians. In 2022, TIHCER released the first-ever validated set of trauma-informed care competencies for undergraduate medical education. The task force focused on undergraduate medical education so that all physicians would be taught these foundational concepts and skills from the outset of training, recognizing that faculty development is needed to achieve this goal. In this Scholarly Perspective, the authors offer a roadmap for implementation of trauma-informed care competencies starting with medical school leadership, a faculty-student advisory committee, and sample resources. Medical schools can use the trauma-informed care competencies as a scaffold to customize integration of curricular content (what is taught) and efforts to transform the learning and clinical environments (how it is taught). Using the lens of trauma will ground undergraduate medical training in the latest science about the pathophysiology of disease and provide a framework to address many of our greatest challenges, including health disparities and professional burnout.

Adverse Childhood Experiences among Reproductive Age Women: Findings from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with many negative health outcomes. Despite this well-documented association, most research on how health conditions affect women's preconception and perinatal health overlooks ACEs. METHODS: This study analyzes self-reported ACE history and health outcomes among young adults (ages 18-39) using data from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Our aims were to 1) assess differences by gender in overall ACE scores and specific ACEs; 2) identify trends in women's ACE scores by birth cohort; and 3) estimate the association of ACE scores with health conditions that increase risk for adverse perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: Findings include that women had higher overall ACE scores than men and that women were more likely to report experiencing seven of the eight ACEs queried. More than 23% of women respondents reported an ACE score of 4+, with a 3-percentage point difference between the youngest and oldest women in our sample. Compared with those reporting zero ACEs, women with four or more ACEs were almost four times as likely to report a history of depression and more than twice as likely to report fair or poor health, even after accounting for sociodemographic characteristics. Women with four or more ACEs were 62% more likely to have obesity, 41% more likely to report a hypertension diagnosis, and 36% more likely to report a diabetes diagnosis than those with zero ACEs. CONCLUSIONS: ACEs are a root cause in the development of adverse health conditions in young women, and their prevention should be central to policies aimed at improving women and children's well-being.

Recommendations for Population-Based Applications of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study: Position Statement by the American College of Preventive Medicine.

Introduction: Childhood adversity profoundly influences health, well-being, and longevity. Prevention and interventions to mitigate its harmful effects are essential. The American College of Preventive Medicine reviewed the research literature and other professional and governmental statements about adverse childhood experiences to support the development of evidence-based and population-focused recommendations about prevention, screening, and mitigation interventions for childhood adversity. Methods: We performed an umbrella review to find, assess and synthesize the evidence from systematic reviews focused on 3 key questions: the prevention or mitigation of the effects of adverse childhood experiences; the association of screening for adverse childhood experiences with various benefits, including health outcomes; and the effectiveness and harms of interventions in individuals with elevated adverse childhood experience scores. Adverse childhood experience‒related recommendations from 6 professional and governmental organizations were also reviewed. On the basis of these reviews, the American College of Preventive Medicine developed a position statement through consensus. Results: A total of 8 systematic reviews, including 260 studies in total, were identified and combined with adverse childhood experiences‒related recommendations from 6 professional organizations to support the American College of Preventive Medicine recommendations. The American College of Preventive Medicine offers 7 adverse childhood experiences‒related recommendations focused on screening, education/training, policy/practice, and research: 2 are evidence-based, and 5 are based on expert opinion. Notably, regarding secondary prevention of adverse childhood experiences, the American College of Preventive Medicine endorses population-level surveillance and research around childhood adversity but not adverse childhood experience screening in individual clinical encounters. Conclusions: Despite limitations in the heterogeneity and quality of the published systematic reviews, the extant literature supports the American College of Preventive Medicine recommendations. Interventions to enhance protective factors and prevent and mitigate the consequences of adverse childhood experiences and other childhood adversity are promising and require further implementation and research.

The Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Cognition in African American Older Adults: An Integrated Literature Review.

The current integrative literature review examined the existing evidence on the connection between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and cognitive changes in African American older adults. Using the Covidence platform, several databases were searched, resulting in 266 publications dated 2008-2020. Ten articles met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Findings indicate that four ACEs (physical, sexual, and verbal abuse, and low socioeconomic status) are associated with impaired cognition in African American older adults. Four gaps were identified: lack of (a) older adult participants in research investigating original and expanded ACEs; (b) exclusively African American samples of participants in studies examining the relationship between ACEs and cognition; (c) consensus about what specific ACEs contribute to changes in cognition in older adults; and (d) information about successful interventions created to prevent and mitigate the effects of ACEs in older adults. This review provides a synthesis of the limited evidence on the effects of ACEs on cognition among other outcomes. Findings on the effects of ACEs on African American older adults' cognition are limited, thus making a compelling case for further investigating the role of childhood adversity in the disparity of cognitive changes in African American communities. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 14(5), 265-272.].

Prevalence and Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Chicago Public School Students in the Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

BACKGROUND: Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) can impair health and other outcomes. To obtain district-level data about the prevalence and impact of ACEs in Chicago Public Schools (CPS), we advocated for CPS to add a short ACE screener to the 2017 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) and analyzed the results. METHODS: Responses to the screener were scored zero, one, or two ACEs. Student scores for violence and victimization, substance use, sexual health risk, mental health, housing insecurity, physical health, grades, and multiple risk/high vulnerability (those students in the top 20% of affirmative responses) were correlated with ACE scores for categories and individual items. RESULTS: Among 1883 student respondents (response rate 73%), there were 17.8% affirmative responses for experiencing physical abuse and 19.8% for witnessing domestic violence; 20% reported at least one ACE and 8% both. A significant dose-response was found for behaviors, experiences, and sleep by ACE scores. CONCLUSIONS: ACEs were common among CPS high school students and associated with many negative behavior and health-related outcomes. Increased awareness of ACEs and their impact among all school personnel can inform and strengthen the development of safer, more supportive, and trauma-informed schools that help all students and families thrive.

Declining health risk exposure among Chicago public high school students: Trends from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey 1997-2017.

There have been improvements nationally in teenagers' self-reported health risk since the 1990s. This study provides an overview of trends in substance use, sexual health, violence and victimization, and suicide risk among Chicago Public High School (CPS) students over a 20-year period. We compared responses to 29 identically worded items from the 1997, 2007, and 2017 Chicago Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) in the four domains. We show changes in responses across individual items, mean changes across the four domains, and change in the proportion of students with highest risk exposure (≥10 affirmative responses). Analyses control for CPS students' grade, sex, and race/ethnicity. Reductions in substance use, sexual health risk, and violence and victimization (30, 40% and 40% in the mean number of affirmative responses, respectively) were observed. Suicide risk showed an initial improvement from 1997 to 2007, only to worsen by 2017 and show little difference from 1997. There was an approximate 70% decrease in the likelihood of being in the high multiple risk category (≥10 affirmative responses) in 2017 compared to 1997 (OR 0.33; CI 0.22-0.49). In alignment with national trends, our study documents significant improvement in Chicago public high school students' long-term health risk exposure over the 20-year study period, with the notable exception of suicide risk. This study emphasizes the need to invest in strategies both inside and outside of the classroom to mitigate the effect of adversity and promote protective factors, which are at the root of academic success and overall wellbeing.

Screening for Toxic Stress Risk Factors at Well-Child Visits: The Addressing Social Key Questions for Health Study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of and demographic characteristics associated with toxic stress risk factors by universal screening, the impact of screening on referral rates to community resources, and the feasibility and acceptability of screening in a medical home setting. STUDY DESIGN: We developed the Addressing Social Key Questions for Health Questionnaire, a 13-question screen of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and unmet social needs. Parents/guardians of children 0-17 years of age received this questionnaire at well-child visits at 4 academic clinics from August 1, 2016 to February 28, 2017. Providers reviewed the tool and referred to community resources as needed. A subset of families completed demographic and satisfaction surveys. Prevalence of ACEs and unmet social needs, community referral rates at 1 site with available data, and family acceptability data were collected. Analyses included frequency distributions, χ2 tests, and Poisson regression. RESULTS: Of 2569 families completing an Addressing Social Key Questions for Health Questionnaire, 49% reported ≥1 stressor; 6% had ≥1 ACE; 47% had ≥1 unmet social need. At 1 site, community referral rates increased from 2.0% to 13.3% (P < .0001) after screening implementation. Risk factors for having a stressor include male sex and African American or Hispanic race. 86% of 446 families want clinics to continue screening. CONCLUSIONS: Universal screening for toxic stress risk factors in pediatric primary care improved identification and management of family needs. Screening was feasible and acceptable to families. Prevalence of unmet social needs but not ACEs was comparable with prior studies. Further evaluation and modification of the screening protocol is needed to increase screening and identification.

Childhood adversity and lifelong health: From research to action.

Childhood adversity is a significant root cause of chronic illness and early death. Prevention, mitigation, and Tx of toxic stressors must be part of our paradigm of care.